Australian Politics
Politics in australia has become so predictable, that i could write labours policy overview just by reading the liberal policy sheet and doing the opposite. It seems John Howard says one thing, then Rudd disagrees, not because he has any original ideas but he plays the for and against game of winning votes. Not once through australian history have i heard a prime minister do things he knew were going to be extremely unpopular to the voting public. I mean , if you were coming up to an election and you knew 70% of people were against joining the war in iraq, the sane thing to do would be wipe your hands clean of it and say "no war for aussie troops". John Howard doesn't do things because they are popular, he does them because they are the morally right thing to do. Whatching a show this afternoon called "saddams road to hell" , the show confirmed to me that ridding the world of saddam "at all costs" was nessesary. About a decade ago, saddams troops murdered over 8000 people and buried their bodies in shallow graves in the centre of iraq. This show was the story of the now free iraqi people digging up the bones to finaly give peice of mind to loved ones that had been "waiting" for their safe return or confirmation of their deaths. As skeleton after skeleton was removed from these shallow graves, clues were given to how each person was brutally murdered, some where blind folded and shot, others seemed to have been bounded and buried alive, small children were thrown in pits with their mothers. body after body was exumed and added to the pile for identification.
Over 8000 people were found in this one area, and searches are still uncovering grave sites all over iraq, so the number of people murdered may never be known.
Saddam was the modern day hitler, he controlled his army and used them in the genecide of his own people. Saddam tried to invade kuwait, hitler tried to invade europe. Both these men needed to be stopped.
In america, if you plan to kill someone and murder them, depending on which state your in, you yourself will be killed, if you take ONE life, you are no longer fit to coincide with society. So why does someone who kills more then 10 000 people not become a worldwide priority to invade a country and remove that person from society. Morally it should of been done the instant the americans new about the crimes, but there was a coruption of interests "oil".
America probally had some idea of Saddams ways in the begining of his reign, but to interfere would of meant loosing access to the vast amounts of oil iraq produces. So rather then make waves, they turned a blind eye to it all, sent donald rumsfeild to iraq on the odd occasion to sip tea and pose for the cameras, just to confirm their right to iraqi oil supplys.
The kuwait war was an exercise of the might of america, and the protection of kuwait and saudi arabias oil feilds, but it did lead to an important idea.....that saddam was dangerous and must be stopped. Clinton tried to rid him from the earth, but failed, but the negative exposure damaged saddams image, leaving him open for a future attack.
Then 9/11. Basicly what followed was a desition of the american goverment to either retreat or attack, and i dont think terrorist cells bargained on george bush to attack in such a way as to knock down their doors and enter their country.
Now, going back to politics, and in paticular the buffoon known as Kevin rudd. He is the ultimate vote junkie, i dont think a word comes out of his mouth without the little voice inside his head saying "will this win me votes" Of course thats what his hired to do , try and win an election, but i think smart australians will see through his "for and against ideals"
Recent debates in parliment have shown a side of kevin which i think the whole of australia should whatch, Firstly he is an extremely arrogant individual, asking the same questions over and over again, trying to "catch" the prime minister on a technicallity or his beloved phrase
"did you not say, on the 12th october 2003 that.....blah ,blah,blah.
Basiclly he has no real original input to make other then look through the prime ministers last 10 years of office and "find" contradictions and mistakes.
Then, once he asks such a question, rather then listening to the answer, he sits down, starts fumbling through his paperwork titled "The life and times of J Howard" and appears to ignore the answer, like he's so happy with the question that the answer is not worth listening to. On top of this, he also turns his back and speaks to fellow labour colleagues, like a child ignoring an authority figure. Kevin knows the retreat of the coalition troops prematuraly will devastate iraq and lead to the regrouping of terrorist cells, but he also knows the voting public dont really care what happens to iraquis, as long as aussie troops are safe in there own beds and he becomes prime minister, he will be fulfilled and thats why he will not answer the question posed to him by the prime minister.
The funniest thing in the recent debate over john howards comments about senater obama policy of troop withdrawel, is rudd wants to say "you have damaged ties with a person who may well be the new resident of the united staes" well yes thats correct, but at the start of the war the labour goverment condemmened george bush for going to war , and on many occasions stated that bush and blair had alterior motives for the war and that both both bush and blair lied to the world about weapons of mass destruction. I'm sure from where george bush was sitting he would of found those comments damaging in nature, and he WAS, still is , and could still be the president for the next few years.
So it seems rudd thinks the practice of having a say is irresponsible if it comes from john howards mouth but it's ok for him to have an opinion because,,,, well i don't know to be honest. Rudd will be the worst thing to happen to this country, because his going to follow the popular vote rather then the "right thing to do "actions. combined with the affiliation with the unions, and his inexperianced labour team, i am scared to see labour come into power.
The years before john howard was elected were statiscally atrocious, foreign dept was massive, unemployment was high, taxes were scattered and difficult to understand. He has been tough and unpopular , but at school i seem to remeber the tough and unpopular teacher were the ones who tought you the most. you might of disliked them { dont get me wrong "i" like john howard}
but at the end of the day they acted and behaved that way to get the best out of you,